365... Tech

Cyberstalking From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Wikistalker redirects here. For cyberstalking as it pertains to Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding. This article is semi-protected indefinitely in response to an ongoing high risk of vandalism. Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk someone. It has been defined as the use of information and communications technology, particularly the Internet, by an individual or group of individuals, to harass another individual, group of individuals, or organization. The behavior includes false accusations, monitoring, the transmission of threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sexual purposes, and gathering information for harassment purposes. The harassment must be such that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress. [1] Contents [hide]     * 1 Definitions     * 2 Behaviors     * 3 Cyberstalking legislation           o 3.1 In the United States           o 3.2 In other countries     * 4 See also     * 5 Notes     * 6 Further reading     * 7 External _link_s Definitions Further information: Stalking Stalking is a continuous process, consisting of a series of actions, each of which may be entirely legal in itself. Lambčr Royakkers writes that:     Stalking is a form of mental assault, in which the perpetrator repeatedly, unwantedly, and disruptively breaks into the life-world of the victim, with whom he has no relationship (or no longer has), with motives that are directly or indirectly traceable to the affective sphere. Moreover, the separated acts that make up the intrusion cannot by themselves cause the mental abuse, but do taken together (cumulative effect). [2] CyberAngels has written about how to identify cyberstalking:     When identifying cyberstalking in the field, and particularly when considering whether to report it to any kind of legal authority, the following features or combination of features can be considered to characterize a true stalking situation: malice, premeditation, repetition, distress, obsession, vendetta, no legitimate purpose, personally directed, disregarded warnings to stop, harassment, and threats.[3] A number of key factors have been identified:     * False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[4]     * Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [5]     * Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.     * False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases.     * Attacks on data and equipment. They may try to damage the victim's computer by sending viruses.     * Ordering goods and services. They order items or subscribe to magazines in the victim's name. These often involve sub_script_ions to pornography or ordering sex toys then having them delivered to the victim's workplace.     * Arranging to meet. Young people face a particularly high risk of having cyberstalkers try to set up meetings between them.[6] Behaviors Cyberstalkers meet or target their victims by using search engines, online forums, bulletin and discussion boards, chat rooms, and more recently, through online communities such as MySpace, Facebook, Bebo, Friendster and Indymedia, a media outlet known for self-publishing. They may engage in live chat harassment or flaming or they may send electronic viruses and unsolicited e-mails. [7] Victims of cyberstalking may not even know that they are being stalked. Cyberstalkers may research individuals to feed their obsessions and curiosity. Conversely, the acts of cyberstalkers may become more intense, such as repeatedly instant messaging their targets. [8] More commonly they will post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact. [7] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory or pornographic content. When prosecuted, many stalkers have unsuccessfully attempted to justify their behavior _base_d on their use of public forums, as opposed to direct contact. Once they get a reaction from the victim, they will typically attempt to track or follow the victim's internet activity. Classic cyberstalking behavior includes the tracing of the victim's IP address in an attempt to verify their home or place of employment. [7] Some cyberstalking situations do evolve into physical stalking, and a victim may experience abusive and excessive phone calls, vandalism, threatening or obscene mail, trespassing, and physical assault.[7] Moreover, many physical stalkers will use cyberstalking as another method of harassing their victims.[9][10] A 2007 study, led by Paige Padgett from the University of Texas Health Science Center, found that there was a false degree of safety assumed by women looking for love online.[11][12] Cyberstalking legislation In the United States The current US Federal Anti-Cyber-Stalking law is found at 47 USC sec. 223.[13] The first U.S. cyberstalking law went into effect in 1999 in California. Other states include prohibition against cyberstalking in their harassment or stalking legislation. In Florida, HB 479 was introduced in 2003 to ban cyberstalking. This was signed into law on October 2003. [14] Some states in the U.S. have begun to address the issue of cyberstalking:     * Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, New Hampshire, and New York have included prohibitions against harassing electronic, computer or e-mail communications in their harassment legislation.     * Alaska, Florida, Oklahoma, Wyoming, and California, have incorporated electronically communicated statements as conduct constituting stalking in their anti-stalking laws.     * Texas enacted the Stalking by Electronic Communications Act, 2001.     * Missouri revised its state harassment statutes to include stalking and harassment by telephone and electronic communications (as well as cyber-bullying) after the Megan Meier suicide case of 2006. [15]     * A few states have both stalking and harassment statutes that criminalize threatening and unwanted electronic communications.     * Other states have laws other than harassment or anti-stalking statutes that prohibit misuse of computer communications and e-mail, while others have passed laws containing broad language that can be interpreted to include cyberstalking behaviors Cyberstalking has also been addressed in recent U.S. federal law. For example, the Violence Against Women Act, passed in 2000, made cyberstalking a part of the federal interstate stalking statute. Still, there remains a lack of legislation at the federal level to specifically address cyberstalking, leaving the majority of legislative prohibitions against cyberstalking at the state level.[7] Most stalking laws require that the perpetrator make a credible threat of violence against the victim; others include threats against the victim's immediate family; and still others require the alleged stalker's course of conduct constitute an implied threat. While some conduct involving annoying or menacing behavior might fall short of illegal stalking, such behavior may be a prelude to stalking and violence and should be treated seriously.[16] Online identity stealth blurs the line on infringement of the rights of would-be victims to identify their perpetrators. There is a debate on how internet use can be traced without infringing on protected civil liberties. In other countries Other countries have begun to include online abuse in their anti- stalking legislation. In Australia, the Stalking Amendment Act (1999) includes the use of any form of technology to harass a target as forms of criminal stalking.

DIRTY, FILTHY ARSELIFTERS! We have the same type of Arselifter here in Australia. His name is Malcom Fabian. Arselifter Malcom Fabian (kangarooistan) couldn't even lie straight in bed. RADICAL MUSLIM RACIST, Malcom Fabian, until recently,  ran an illegal business called Kangarooistan Enterprises. THe address of this business was listed as 7 Macfarlane Terrace, Mt Barker SA. This is the address of Fabian's local mosque. Here are the details for this mosque. Mount Barker Mosque. Address: 7 Macfarlane Terrace, Mount Barker SA 5251. Phone: (08) 8391 5417. Radical Muslim Racist, Malcom Fabian, continues to threaten sun tanned Aussies. The abode of this Radical piece os shit has been recently established with 100% accuracy. Residents of the Mt Barker and Adelaide area in general should be on the lookout for this Radical Muslim Racist, Malcom Fabian. For the benefit of those who cannot identify this vile individual, here is a recent photo of this individual. http://www.facebook.com/profile/pic.php?oid=AAAAAQAQxW_r5gtOCvE9rUzJt... For some time it has been suspected that Arselifter Malcom Fabian is a resident of 5 Pfeiffer Close, Mt Barker, South Australia 5251. I can now confirm with 100% certainity that this is the abode of Arselifter Malcom Fabian. This is how I can prove this with 100% certainity. Look carefully at the photo of Emily Fabian in the photo in this _link_. http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0Ab8hlafT770nZGR6cHZqOThfMHhwY2szYmc... The photo above the note Trailer park trash!!!!!!!!!!! should be of particular interest. Note the houses in the background in particular the three houses in the street below. Now search 5 Pfeiffer Close, Mt Barker, South Australia 5251 on Google Maps. http://www.google.com.au/ You will then get an aerial view of the area.  If you attempt to go to a street view on this address, it will not work.  It used to, however, I believe Arselifter Malcom had  Google Maps delete his detail. If, however, you were to search on No. 1 Pfeiffer Close, Mt Barker, South Australia 5251, you can then go down and look at the area at street level. You need to turn the view around, using the arrows at the top left of the street view.  If you view Pfeiffer Cl looking up the street, you will see Arselifter Malcom's house right at the end of the street.  there is a car parked in the driveway and slightly to the right of the car a large gum tree at the rear of the house. Now scroll the view around 180 degrees and look at the street below. Does anything look familiar? Look at the slate coloured two tiered roofed house and then there is a house mostly obscured by a tree (white or galvanized roofed house and then another slate coloured roof house and next to it a red roofed house (two tiered). Note also the cream steel fence on the house on the left side entering Pfeiffer Cl. This proves 100% where Arselifter Malcom Fabian lives.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2649899/al_qaeda_to_surgical... Terrorists with al Qaeda are creating ever more inventive ways to smuggle bombs onto planes, trains, and subways. Thus, federal authorities must keep up and find ways to identify when a terrorist is loaded with explosives and capture him or her before they set off the bomb. British counter terrorism authorities are hearing chatter about a new technique to help al Qaeda terrorists prevent detection when they are carrying bombs for suicide attacks, according to the Daily Mail. MI5 The bombs will now be surgically implanted into the bodies of the terrorists in areas ranging from breasts, near the appendix and in the buttocks. The surgically implanted bombs are an attempt to avoid detection by airport body screening technology. The bomb would contain PETN (Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate). Even just 8 oz of PETN is enough to create a blast strong enough to create a hole in an airplane. Once the bomb was surgically implanted into the body, the terrorist would use a syringe to propel TATP (Triacetone Triperoxide) through the skin covering the bomb and into the PETN, which would cause it to explode. While it might be difficult to obtain the privacy needed to inject something via syringe into the skin while on an air flight or on a bus or the subway, terrorists could always implement this new bomb strategy while in the restroom of a plane or use a blanket or bulky coat to cover up what they are doing. The Daily Mail states that in Britain, Senior Government security sources confirmed last night that they were aware of the new threat of body bombs, but were not prepared to make any official comment. Placing bombs inside a terrorist's body has already been done by other methods. The Telegraph reports that last August Abdullah al-Asiri, wanted by Saudi Arabia, had a bomb placed into his large intestine. It was later activated by a cell phone. Al Qaeda claimed ownership of this attack. The terrorist set off the bomb while meeting with Prince Mohammed Bin Nayef , head of counter terrorism in Saudi Arabia. He asked the Prince to speak to someone on his cell phone and during that time the bomb was activated. Lately Osama bin Laden has been released two audio tapes. The first tape threatened America. Al Qaeda also claimed responsibility for the Christmas day attempt to blow up flight #253 over Detroit. Let's hope officials can stay ahead of al Qaeda and other terror groups. It is urgent that American airports be equipped with equipment that can detect the latest terror strategies used to being bombs on board planes.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2649899/al_qaeda_to_surgical... Terrorists with al Qaeda are creating ever more inventive ways to smuggle bombs onto planes, trains, and subways. Thus, federal authorities must keep up and find ways to identify when a terrorist is loaded with explosives and capture him or her before they set off the bomb. More Western propagandist bullshit and morons like you lap it all up Redman

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2649899/al_qaeda_to_surgical... Terrorists with al Qaeda are creating ever more inventive ways to smuggle bombs onto planes, trains, and subways. Thus, federal authorities must keep up and find ways to identify when a terrorist is loaded with explosives and capture him or her before they set off the bomb. And here's something else for you to ponder: The new audio tape from Osama bin Laden taking responsibility for the idiotic and childish incident in Detroit where moronic Nigerian armed with a useless bomb is simply too much. Now using audio tapes because, supposedly, nobody in Al Qaeda got a flash drive video recorder for Christmas is even more of a joke. Please, with the hundreds of millions our Saudi allies have given to terrorists, a video camera the size of an IPod might have been a nice touch. Even funnier was releasing the audio, using algorithm software probably illegally downloaded off the internet, and giving it to Al Jazeera. Pundit Debbie Schussell, former Mark Siljander (VT staff writer) staffer, has bitterly complained about the strong ties between Fox News and Al Jazeera. Fox owner, Rupert Murdoch, is the most powerful influencer of the ultra-rightists in Israel. Attempts by the press to present Al Jazeera of today as the pro-terrorist media it seemed like many years ago is an epic misrepresentation. A further abuse, of course, is not only that we are no longer seeing the easily debunked bin Laden doubles whose video tapes were mysteriously released by SITE Intelligence, the Rita Katz/Israeli group that seems to find them in trash bins behind delicatessens. The new audio tape itself contains statements claiming credit for 9/11 in direct contradiction to the real bin Laden videos, the only ones authenticated. If you wondered why the FBI doesn't list Osama bin Laden as a suspect in 9/11, I think you have your answer. If they think the bin Laden admissions aren't credible, I wonder who the FBI is investigating or if they have simply been told to mind their own business. The terrorist incident itself is the last thing Al Qaeda would ever take responsibility for despite the claims by SITE Intelligence that they found an unnamed and unverified internet site that confirmed this. Who in the name of all that is holy would want to take responsibility for an idiot who was led onto an American bound plane by passing around searches, customs and passport control in an airport run by an Israeli security company but who carried a bomb designed by a three year old. Who would be so stupid as to try to pass off this childish tape when reliable witnesses saw the terrorist being led onto the plane in Amsterdam in a manner that required full cooperation from security personnel, passport control and the airline itself. We don't even have to go into the fact that the terrorists in Yemen that supposedly claimed responsibility were released from Guantanamo under the personal signature of Vice President Cheney in 2007 or that before the incident, the government of Yemen tied these individuals to Israeli controllers thru captured computers. I am only thankful that the duped terrorist, or as Lee Oswald had said, patsy , was the moronic son of a long time Mossad business associate in Nigeria. Mr. Mutallab, banker, but mostly head of Nigeria's defence industry, DICON, managed almost entirely by Israelis, may have much more story to tell other than the one he told CIA Chief of Station on November 19, 2009. Do we want to follow former Homeland Security director Chertoff, not only a Jewish activist but currently representing companies selling body scanners to airports and the mysterious ability for someone on worldwide terrorist watch lists to be escorted onto a US bound airliner without passport or search? Billions in profits were realized almost instantly after this incident. Companies tied to Chertoff, Israel and India were on the receiving end. The only reliable information the world has on Osama bin Laden is that he was killed by American troops on December 13, 2001 and buried outside Tora Bora by his following, 30 Mujahedeen. At least 6 of these witnesses were alive at last check. Since his death, every leaked video or statement has been timed for convenient electoral terrorist scares, been childishly unprofessional and has only worked to discredit Islam. Every effort has been made by the MSM/corporate press to cover the facts behind the Christmas bombing and push the blame on everyone but the obvious culprits. That effort was deemed so successful that now a brazen attempt to resurrect long dead Osama bin Laden to take responsibility for trying to set off a bomb with a flame igniter that could only be exploded using a blasting cap, is being made. Is this an attempt to make Al Qaeda look stupid? My name is Osama bin Laden. I had a moron carry a defective bomb onto a plane full of Islamic families returning to Detroit, the most Muslim city in the west, as part of a terror campaign. I chose a flight that connected from the Middle East so I could kill as many of the innocent faithful as possible. Please excuse this and the dozen or other mistakes made but being dead has left me less sharp than I once was. No, I do not work for the Mossad, they simply tape and distribute my interviews. This is part of an agreement with my talent agent who is Jewish. All talent agents are Jewish, ask anyone in Hollywood. What do you expect, miracles? 10% of nothing is nothing. For my faithful followers, I expect to be a regular on Californication next season on Showtime. I'll be the guy with the beard who seems dead. The second possibility, one designed for the spiritual crowd is this: I am Osama, the ghost of Tora Bora. Please give more money to Israel, vote to extend the Patriot Act and buy new airport scanners from the companies listed on my weekly newsletter distributed by SITE Intelligence. Watch for more insane threats coming in the future and have a nice weekend. Remember to stop eating pork. Any group that could make 5 airliners outwit NORAD, the most advanced air defence system in the world, any group that could train terrorist pilots inside the United States itself with nobody catching on, and it gets worse. Sources tell us that FBI Special Agent Stephen Butler may have   accidentally been cashing checks for and paying rent for two of the 9/11 hijackers. Can people who can get this kind of thing done put a moron on an aircraft at an airport secured by an Israeli company, extremely closely related to the same company that managed security at all of the airports used on 9/11? When Michigan attorney Kurt Haskell and his wife witnessed the famous, he has no passport, he is a Sudanese refugee, we do this all the time , incident in Amsterdam, only a phony bin Laden tape could make America forget, or so they hope. Imagine our terrorist being taken to meet the security head for the airline with his Indian looking handler, bomb strapped to his underwear. Think of this exploding moron and his handler and who they would have had to know to get past, not only airline security and the Israeli company guarding the airport but Dutch passport control as well. Anyone with the power to load the crotch bomber on a plane with no passport could have put a nuclear weapon in luggage easier. Nukes are seldom on watch lists or have parents running to the CIA reporting them as terrorists. Next time we are being lied to, please, have more respect. Not everyone is a dumb as a Fox News, CNN, the Wall Street Journal or the New York Times. It is one thing claiming that poor, long dead Osama bin Laden runs terrorists in Yemen. It is quite something else proving that he manages an airport in Europe or runs the Dutch government. When US Senators can't get thru airport security without being detained, bin Laden's ability to get diplomatic VIP treatment for known terrorists makes him more than a threat, it makes him a magician. We are thankful that nobody was seriously injured and that we can all laugh about this, maybe not all of us. The people of Nigeria don't think it is funny. Millions of Muslims aren't seeing the joke either. Air travellers are having their bad moments also. Some, however, have benefitted in a major way, politically, financially and militarily. None of those people, however, are ever openly accused of terrorism. Jesus, you couldn't make it up Redman